Is it necessary to make a textual distinction between writing as a response to space and writings which reflect on those responses, to make aware the shift in the ordinal reception of the work, or to allow for a dynamic to manifest out of an unspecified push and pull of response and reflection? The immediacy of the text becomes a matter of scale and the self referential, the writing on the process of writing as a response, once and twice removed (a ternary reception, or more so still) becomes a filtration, an act in retaining the impression of a space through words, words that are, most importantly not attempting to describe, words that are, for the most part seemingly unrelated but which carry the indispensable quality of the space.
